less, but fortunately well-tired car should make it to the probably-
closed airport.
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Snow
less, but fortunately well-tired car should make it to the probably-
closed airport.
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Zang Mi
We are currently sitting in Zang Mi one of the local Tibetan cultural
shows near the park. I believe that I can see my breath and my father
in law is wrapped up in a down vest.
shows near the park. I believe that I can see my breath and my father
in law is wrapped up in a down vest.
Josh Schmidt
Sent from my iPhone
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Horse trekking = horse and trekking
(and tent camping) not even a week after the camel adventure. More
details to come when back at computer. And maybe more photos tomorrow c
Friday, October 15, 2010
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
How can a self respecting research journal publish this drivel?
I am rather late to this particular game, since I didn't see the article until today. But I am a geologist, not a biologist, so I think I can be excused. Someone named Dr. Kern at JHU published a completely absurd article in some not-too-well-respected research journal in biology. There have been some fabulous responses, so before sharing mine, I wanted to give you links to some of the other blog responses by Isis the Scientist, Janet, Rebecca, Chemjobber, and Mike the Mad Biologist.
Rather than try to sum up the offensive thing, let me quote Rebecca that Dr. Kern is "chiding ... basically anyone who isn’t in the lab 60+ hours every week about how they lack passion about their research, and are essentially letting sick people die because they think they have the “right” to lives outside of the lab."
That is ridiculous! Dr. Kern at one point says:
During the survey period, off-site laypersons offer comments on my observations. “Don’t the people with families have a right to a career in cancer research also?” I choose not to answer. How would I? Do the patients have a duty to provide this “right”, perhaps by entering suspended animation? Should I note that examining other measures of passion, such as breadth of reading and fund of knowledge, may raise the same concern and that “time” is likely only a surrogate measure? Should I note that productive scientists with adorable family lives may have “earned” their positions rather than acquiring them as a “right”? Which of the other professions can adopt a country-club mentality, restricting their activities largely to a 35–40 hour week? Don’t people with families have a right to be police? Lawyers? Astronauts? Entrepreneurs?
Last time I checked, working included: lab work, reading and replying to emails, writing and reviewing grant proposals, field work, writing and reviewing papers, teaching (and all the billions of things that go with that), and numerous other activities which don't include spending Saturday in a lab.
Why is his definition of passion the only one?
Uck. These people are a bit part of the reason that the pipeline is so leaky even though more women than men got Phds last year. And that single women and single men have about the same chance of getting tenure, but married men fare much better and married women fare much worse. What does that say about my chances?
Rather than try to sum up the offensive thing, let me quote Rebecca that Dr. Kern is "chiding ... basically anyone who isn’t in the lab 60+ hours every week about how they lack passion about their research, and are essentially letting sick people die because they think they have the “right” to lives outside of the lab."
That is ridiculous! Dr. Kern at one point says:
During the survey period, off-site laypersons offer comments on my observations. “Don’t the people with families have a right to a career in cancer research also?” I choose not to answer. How would I? Do the patients have a duty to provide this “right”, perhaps by entering suspended animation? Should I note that examining other measures of passion, such as breadth of reading and fund of knowledge, may raise the same concern and that “time” is likely only a surrogate measure? Should I note that productive scientists with adorable family lives may have “earned” their positions rather than acquiring them as a “right”? Which of the other professions can adopt a country-club mentality, restricting their activities largely to a 35–40 hour week? Don’t people with families have a right to be police? Lawyers? Astronauts? Entrepreneurs?
Last time I checked, working included: lab work, reading and replying to emails, writing and reviewing grant proposals, field work, writing and reviewing papers, teaching (and all the billions of things that go with that), and numerous other activities which don't include spending Saturday in a lab.
Why is his definition of passion the only one?
Uck. These people are a bit part of the reason that the pipeline is so leaky even though more women than men got Phds last year. And that single women and single men have about the same chance of getting tenure, but married men fare much better and married women fare much worse. What does that say about my chances?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)